guglsend.blogg.se - Colloquy antonym

COLLOQUY ANTONYM HOW TO

Synonyms make language more interesting, more meaningful, and more relevant. Since word choice is everything in language (probably the most crucial part!), the importance of synonyms is beyond measure. Words like “rapidly,” “gobbling,” “awful,” and “terrible” are much more descriptive than “quickly,” “eating,” and “bad”-they have the same meanings as Sentence 1, but stronger connotations.

The youngster was speedily consuming a freezing ice cream cone, which gave him a terrible headache.Īs you can see, the three sentences above share the same situation, but, Sentences 2 and 3 paint a better picture because they use synonyms for some of the dull words in Sentence 1.

The little kid was rapidly gobbling a frosty ice cream cone, which gave him an awful headache.

The small child was quickly eating a cold ice cream cone, which gave him a bad headache.

Easy: Simple, effortless, straightforward.

Here are some synonyms of words you use every day: What’s more, synonyms are so important that there is a whole reference work dedicated to them, called a thesaurus-it’s a dictionary of synonyms! They come in all parts of speech: nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, and so on. The term synonym comes from a combination of the Ancient Greek syn, meaning with, and onoma, meaning “name.” Synonyms are regular and essential parts of everyday language that we use almost without thinking.

When words or phrases have the same meaning, we say that they are synonymous of each other.

The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for quality and objectivity.A synonym ( sin- uh-nim) is a word that has the same or nearly the same meaning as another word. It has been reviewed in draft form by persons chosen for their diverse perspectives and expertise in accordance with procedures approved by the National Academies' Report Review Committee. This report reflects the views of the individuals who participated in the plenary and breakout groups. "Colloquy on Minority Males in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics" presents a summary of the Colloquy's breakout and plenary discussions, which addressed (a) research questions articulated in the breakout groups together with theories and methodologies to begin to address these questions and (b) considerations for a potential research solicitation for the NSF, with major areas of inquiry concerning access, participation, and success for minority males in STEM. Washington Conference Center in Baltimore, Maryland, with approximately 40 participants, most of them researchers in education, psychology, sociology, mathematics, and physics. In addition, NSF hoped to gain community input to inform the parameters of a future NSF research program that could effectively address minority male participation in STEM. There was particular interest in framing a research agenda to study how interactions between minority males and societal and educational systems (both formal and informal) encourage or discourage the young men's interest and persistence in STEM.

COLLOQUY ANTONYM HOW TO

The NSF recognized the need to gather input from research communities that focus on minority males about how to frame investigations of gender-based factors that impact learning and choice in STEM education (both at the precollege and higher education levels) and the workforce for minority males. On August 8-12, 2010 the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), with funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF), convened the Colloquy on Minority Males in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), following the release of several reports highlighting the educational challenges facing minority males.